Skip to Content

Ultimate Fort Bend - your resource for the news, events, and places that mean the most to you.

  •  

    Sidewalk compromise announced (updated)

    Missouri City and First Colony are announcing a new compromise to solve an old dispute: How to resolve sidewalk failures caused by “street trees.”

    Under the compromise — described at Monday's City Council meeting — the city will make repairs once residents have removed or otherwise “mitigated” problem trees planted between the sidewalk and curb.

    First Colony Community Association has agreed — on a pre-approved, case-by-case basis — to allow residents to remove, relocate or replace trees to fix the problem, while aiming to maintain the canopy that is a popular subdivision feature.

    “People have been talking about sidewalks, sidewalks, sidewalks during every election,” said Councilman Robin Elackatt, whose District C includes part of First Colony. “This is the first time that the FCCA and the city have come up with a mutually agreeable compromise that is going to be good for the city as a whole and especially for District C.”

    FCCA Executive Director Sherrie Knoepfel called the compromise “a reasonable outcome for everyone,” worked out between elected officials and staff from both sides. “The issue is finally put to bed and it’s been a long time coming.”

    Cracked sidewalks are a problem with deep roots in First Colony, a three-decades-old subdivision that prides itself on its canopy of mature street trees.

    Three-fourths of First Colony’s 10,000 residents live in the city of Sugar Land, which has more neighborhoods with sidewalks and more readily makes repairs, Knoepfel said.

    The other 2,500 residents are inside the limits of Missouri City, which budgets about $150,000 a year to repair sidewalks, and has declined to make repairs when tree roots or other underlying problems could cause repeat damage.

    In a citywide sidewalk repair update Jan. 4, Public Works Director Scott Elmer recommended that the city more than double the amount it budgets each year on sidewalk repairs, to about $350,000. Since May 2007, the city has spent nearly $390,000 on 300-plus work orders throughout the city, Elmer said.

    Elmer also is recommending the city hire a sidewalk repair contractor, to allow for quicker response.

    City Manager Frank Simpson said FCCA’s new acknowledgement that some street trees need to be removed if they cause infrastructure problems is “quite a big change.”

    In Knoepfel’s view, the city of Missouri City also has come a long way in creating a more cooperative atmosphere.

    “I think there’s just been a metamorphosis over time, philosophically, with Missouri City in some things related to development and how they interact with the homeowner associations,” she said. “I think there has been enlightenment on how important trees are to the community.”

    Knoepfel said FCCA’s main area of compromise is in allowing homeowners more flexibility in addressing the problem — including the option in some cases of replacing street trees with yard trees that also canopy the street.

    Language approved by both the city and FCCA states that property owners are basically responsible for sidewalk repairs and/or replacements due to damage caused by the property owner.

    “For damage caused by street trees or other right-of-way landscaping, the homeowner must mitigate the tree or landscaping prior to the city making the sidewalk repair,” the new joint policy states.
    “Mitigation” could include root pruning, root barriers, tree removal or relocation, irrigation systems and “alternative materials for sidewalk replacement.”

    In the new policy, which will be posted on missouricitytx.gov, the city “reserves the right to take direct action if necessary,” although a mutually agreeable resolution is “preferred.”

    “When willful neglect is involved or a homeowner refuses to address the tree issue, the city engineer may issue an order for the resident to take action within a certain time period. If there is no resolution, the city may construct improvements and assess expenses to the homeowner.”

    FCCA has developed its own “street tree removal guidelines” for homeowners, which call street trees “an important and desirable part of First Colony.”

    In some instances, the guidelines state, a tree may need to be removed “due to its proximity to infrastructure, utilities, lack of growing space, health of the tree or other significant issues.”

    The guidelines direct residents to submit a modification application with the community association if they want to remove a tree, and state that all removals require prior approval.

    Possible solutions could include removing the tree, replacing the tree with another specimen, or replacing the tree with a yard tree that eventually will canopy over the street.

    Knoepfel said residents care deeply about trees, but must recognize that sometimes they need to be pruned, thinned or removed. She praised the willingness of city officials to see First Colony’s point of view.

    “I think it’s been a very good exercise in cooperation and compromise on behalf of both entities.”


    Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Houston Chronicle.

    Comments

    Amazing they are suddenly finding a solution to this right

    Amazing they are suddenly finding a solution to this right before city elections, but is it a solution? It looks like the FCCA and city have still lumped the initial costs on the backs of the homeowners again.

    transparencyingovt

    I wonder why the city has let FCCA dictate the terms of this for

    I wonder why the city has let FCCA dictate the terms of this for so long while ignoring the FCCA residents and what they want?

    transparencyingovt

    Solution? What Solution?

    This isn't a solution to the homeowners involved. What it entails is the homeowner paying for removal of the tree, which could easily cost several thousand dollars, but only if the Association approves it. Then, the City will pay for the sidewalk repair, maybe, if the City has the funding. Isn't it easier and cheaper for the homeowner to just repair the sidewalk with his/her own funds and avoid the fuss? This isn't compromise, its putting the blame and responsibility for the tree's growth on the homeowner, who probably wasn't even around when the tree was planted.

    First Colony and Missouri City don't seem to mesh very well

    Another example is one also involving FBISD; when the Plantation Trails subdivision was developed in the First Colony portion of Missouri City, First Colony should have worked to get it zoned to the schools on Dulles Blvd, just like everything around it on the west side of FM 1092. Instead, FBISD has it zoned to have to cross busy FM 1092 to attend the lower-ranking Quail Valley schools; it's one of the only subdivisions in First Colony that doesn't attend schools in First Colony, and one of the few where FBISD makes an exception to its rule of using FM 1092 as an east/west zoning boundary. That's the reason there are so few young children in Plantation Trails; lovely subdivision close to everything, but young families end up selling and moving west to get into a better school zone.

    "This isn't a solution to the homeowners involved. What it

    "This isn't a solution to the homeowners involved. What it entails is the homeowner paying for removal of the tree, which could easily cost several thousand dollars, but only if the Association approves it."

    But it looks good before city elections. This sounds very familiar. Didn't they claim this was all solved during the last city elections?

    What a pity!

    People want to save several hundreds dollars for NOT repairing the sidewalk but to move, even replace, a well grown tree that benefit the whole community?

    Any idiot would have looked at what has happened in the Med

    Any idiot would have looked at what has happened in the Med Center over the years and known not to plant trees near the sidewalks. Unfortunately, the people who come up with these ideas are not as smart as idiots. They're probably the same less-than-idiots who came up with the idea of HOAs...

    http://www.spambob.net/ConservativeChronicle/index.php?topic=103.0

     

    Post new comment

    Post New Comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img> <i> <b>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
    • Images can be added to this post.

    More information about formatting options

    By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.