When the giant sugar cube drops from the clock tower at midnight New Year’s Eve in Sugar Land Town Square, city leaders will be hoping that this brand-new tradition will usher in a prosperous 2010.
A number of major capital projects are on Sugar Land’s agenda for 2010.
The city will be putting together financing and operations groups for the development of two major entertainment venues — a minor league baseball stadium and an indoor concert facility — which were authorized by voters a year ago but have been moving more slowly than expected due to economic conditions, said Mayor James Thompson.
Another focus will be on the redevelopment of the now-idle Imperial Sugar processing site, which Thompson calls “a major icon in the city.” That project also has languished but will be on the front burner in 2010.
At the end of 2009 the city signed off on a more than $80 million project to build a water treatment plant and related infrastructure that will enable the city to convert from groundwater to surface water as mandated by the state.
The new facility ultimately will have the capacity to treat 22 million gallons of water a day.
Legislation passed by the Texas Legislature in 2009 paves the way for Sugar Land to acquire a portion of the state’s Central Prison Unit known as Smithville for expansion of the Sugar Land Regional Airport.
This redevelopment is expected to create more than 2,000 new jobs and $1 million in additional annual revenue to the city.
Mobility projects will continue in 2010 with the improvement of Dulles Avenue from U.S. 90A to Texas 6 under an accelerated contract and the redesign of University Boulevard corridor with the addition of new roads and bridges to accommodate development of Newland Properties.
Also planned are continued improvements to parks and additional hike-and-bike trails throughout the city.
“We have a lot on our plate,” said Thompson, who pledges to continue working closely with neighboring cities and other partners in Fort Bend County.
“What each of us does affects the whole county and region,” he said.
Intermodal Center
Something that could have a big impact on the county and region is what Rosenberg Mayor Joe Gurecky calls “the sleeping giant”— the Kansas City Southern Railroad’s Intermodal Center — which is like an inland port and being developed along U.S. 59 in Rosenberg’s extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Although the site is in its early stages of development, KSC has been running trains here regularly and Nissan is already unloading automobiles from trains to trucks for distribution, said Gurecky.
He adds that another company is in the final stages of negotiations to build a 750,000-square-foot distribution center here in 2010.
“It will be a huge center and it will definitely have an impact locally — some say negative, some say positive,” Gurecky said.
Local residents are concerned about heavy truck traffic, he said, not to mention “50 trains rumbling through Rosenberg every day. These are some of the issues we will face.”
But the facility is projected to create anywhere from 750 to more than 2,000 jobs.
Gurecky points out that Rosenberg used to be known as the Hub of the Gulf Coast “and we’re getting back to that.”
Another major initiative in Rosenberg in 2010 will be a transit study launched by the recently-created Rosenberg Development Corp.
In November, the RDC awarded a contract to Traffic Engineers Inc. to conduct the study, which will look for ways to improve transportation and mobility in Fort Bend County, including pedestrian and bike mobility.
The county is funding 80 percent of the study. The survey and public meetings are slated to get under way in February.
Next year “will be an exciting year,” said Gurecky. “We’re planning for the future.”
From the viewpoint of Fort Bend County Judge Bob Hebert, “right now, signs are good for increased activity” in the county in 2010.
Hebert, like Gurecky, is keeping a close watch on the KSC Intermodal Center.
“We’ll have to see how quickly tenant development occurs.” He said he is anticipating construction at the site in 2010, but that “could slide into 2011.”
“We’ve had a lot of projects coming to Fort Bend County that were put on hold because of the recession,” he said. Some have been announced and others are still confidential.
“At least two of these had anticipated starting construction in 2010 but are currently on hold because they have national and international markets. But they are committed to land in Fort Bend County,” he said.
Mobility a priority
Mobility is always high on the list of projects for the county.
While major rebuilds of state and federal highways such as Texas 6, U.S. 90A and U.S. 59 have been mostly completed, with the result that “traffic moves fairly well in Fort Bend County right now,” the county continues to struggle to get funds to improve county roads that connect these major highways.
One of these projects, the improvement of FM 1464 from the Westpark Tollway to the Grand Parkway, will be completed in 2010, but the county’s chances are slim of winning federal funding to improve a clogged Crabb River Road south of U.S. 59 to FM 762, where a large school is being built.
“It’s a terrible bottleneck and it’s going to get worse,” Hebert said.
Overlaying the plans and prospects for Fort Bend County in 2010 is the fact that it is a census year, which means an updated head count of residents as well as new data on all kinds of topics.
The county’s population is estimated to be more than 550,000 now — reflecting a growth rate of 25,000 to 30,000 per year.
In the next 20 years the county’s population will double, said Jeff Wiley, president of the Fort Bend Economic Development Council.
“That means we need to double job growth,” Wiley said. And he believes the county is poised for that to happen.
“We have a regional and a national reputation as a good place to do business and to live,” he said.
Wiley points to the tremendous growth in major and ancillary medical facilities along U.S. 59 in Sugar Land over the last few years.
“The health-care market leads job growth in Fort Bend County, and the school systems are next,” he said, adding that the EDC is “actively talking with business partners about expanding UH-Sugar Land to focus on health care.”
Biotechnology is also a growing industry in the county, Wiley said, and the EDC sees “an opportunity for these businesses to form a coalition of high-tech companies to attract more like them to Fort Bend County.”
He said the EDC is working with CenterPoint Energy on IT services such as redundant power to enable these kinds of companies to set up here.
He is also excited about the Intermodal Center, which he says will “jump-start job creation and growth” and create “transformational opportunities” locally and regionally.
Wiley points out that besides the KSC development, on the other side of U.S. 59 a major business park is being developed by GBI Properties, focusing on Asian companies that would come to the county to set up markets here, taking advantage of the Foreign Trade Zone designation for both facilities that is expected to become final in early 2010.





Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Houston Chronicle.
Comments
Thanks Ms. Perin for the very informative article
Very interesting read!
It's wonderful to see that the Imperial Sugar site is in the spotlight again. As Sugar Land's best historic site and source of unique identity by most accounts, the fact that the project had languished was a sore spot for many Sugar Land residents. I hope to see some REAL movement on that site in 2010. If public perception becomes that mayor Thompson has failed to make this happen, it could be bad for his political career.
Other great news is the Sugar Land Regional Airport expansion and job creation that will arise from it.
Great idea on having UH Sugar Land offer more medical and biotech related degrees. Pearland is trying to harness the nanotech industry for southeast Texas. Could Sugar Land do it for biotech, or is The Woodlands already ahead? What about alternative/renewable energy? Perhaps the county and city leaders really need to come together on this and make something happen... really get the county on the map and create a huge number of jobs. Might a good spot for something like this be the current Jester prison facility? Should the county petition the state to have it moved, as Sugar Land has with the Smithville facility? It has a great strategic location on the Grand Pkwy. I like this guy's idea on creation of a huge Biofuel technology center, before another region can (of course his idea is for Houston to do it, but knowing the city of Houston I wouldn't be surprised for them to miss a good opportunity to get on the economic buzz map)... full article here http://houstonstrategies.blogspot.com/2009/06/securing-houstons-economic...
More of the same at taxpayers expense (or burning out the bonds?
Why would we need to turn a sleepy suburban community this close to the 4th largest city in the country into another urban center. People and small business are attracted here because its proximity to Houston and not to become it. It is quickly becoming an area unfriendly to families. There doesn't need to be more service sector jobs moved to SL. Try and keep the empty and half empty strip centers full first. Do we really need more? Create quality of life green zones and do something about the rising crime through the elimination of high density housing and these budget hotels popping up everywhere. The traffic is bad enough because of the unsustainable model and propaganda coming out of Wiley's organization which we pay our tax dollars to and believe it or not the big Houston development companies pushing this agenda already have the prison land (see last years reports on this transfer).
transparencyingovt
I'd just like to see these politicians and development
I'd just like to see these politicians and development corporations foot the bill for all this development, rather than passing the risk off onto us taxpayers. If we stopped subsidizing it we would see more manageable growth and less public debt.
" and the redesign of University Boulevard corridor with the
" and the redesign of University Boulevard corridor with the addition of new roads and bridges to accommodate development of Newland Properties."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but why isn't NP paying for these upgrades and improvements? When do these boys begin to take their own risk while cashing in?
I just wonder if Newland company managers and executives are on
I just wonder if Newland company managers and executives are on many of our local elected officials finance reports, like Bob Heberts, Thompsons or Owens. Well, no I don't wonder. I have seen these reports and all 3 are packed with some of the largest developer company related campaign donations in this county. Nothing new here.
The buck will keep being past to the taxpayers for these projects as long as we elect these boys to office and then act stunned when the tax bills role in each year. Too bad it is us paying the piper for many of these companies. It's too bad individual homeowners can't get TIRZs located on their properties the way these connected companies can.
transparencyingovt
There's nothing like the "pay to play" system of TX, right?
There's nothing like the "pay to play" system of TX, right?
transparencyingovt
To anonymous below
Did you know that the problem with low budget hotels and large apartments going up would not be an issue if the utility districts would stop letting them get built around the neighborhoods? I heard of one utility district that is about to have 4 large apartments to 9 single family home subdivisions. This is almost half apartment developments in ratio to neighborhoods! Why is this allowed? Look at what has happened to Kempner. Residents need to just start contacting these districts, officials and development companies and expressing how unsatisfactory this is becoming. Email them. bod(AT)waterdistrict25.com -- dgarrett(AT)cypressmail.com (last one plans to sell land for over 400 new apartment units in our area!) I need to get the others to post later.
NO MORE APARTMENTS!
Thanks telfair resident, but the problem in new neighborhoods like Telfair and others is the MUD boards are appointed by the developers who are selling this land to the apt. developers. You can pressure them, but more than likely you will need to go after SL council and the commissioners, but many of them too also accept these contributions and are already hip deep in the 'deal'. With all this said, I would still encourage you to push hard on this because it does hurt the school district because of the taxing disparity between single family homes and apts. I remember driving through Telfair the other day and seeing the new 'multi-family (code word in land use for apts)' sign out front of the community. Most of the large well connected companies wait to put these projects in last after thousands have already moved in. Get a petition drive going in your community and make it very public and then go pressure the commissioners and council people. I guarantee you will get no help from Thompson or Hebert, but shine the light on them anyway as well as Jeff Wiley, GFBCEDC president, since it is their organization that helps advance these plans behind closed doors.
transparencyingovt
Grand Parkway
I can't wait to hear in '10 how important the Grand Parkway is to the Greatwood/Tara/Canyon Gate/Bridlewood/ etc. area, especially if the county doesn't get stimulus funds to widen Crabb River Road.
It wouldn't bother me a bit if the Grand Parkway Association just died. Every facet of that group is a greedy, non-local idiots determined to profit on others' misery.
Post new comment