Skip to Content

Ultimate Fort Bend - your resource for the news, events, and places that mean the most to you.

 

Districts sue education chief on grading law

David Feldman, a Houston attorney who represents several school districts opposed to a new state mandate to ditch the "minimum grade" practice, told me that he filed a lawsuit in Travis County district court on Wednesday.

The suit names Texas Education Commissioner Robert Scott as the defendant regarding his interpretation of Senate Bill 2033, which requires school districts to record a student’s true grade and stop forcing teachers to assign a false minimum grade.

The Fort Bend school district filed the suit with the Alief, Klein, Aldine, Clear Creek and Anahuac districts.

Click here to read about the grading issue, which I wrote about earlier.

Classroom teachers have expressed concerns about being required by school districts to give a student an arbitrary minimum grade – 50 in the Fort Bend school district - when the student’s actual grade falls below that number.

Scott, in his letter to superintendents across the state, stressed the need for truth in grades reflected on report cards at each grading period.

The lawsuit, however, claims Scott overstepped his authority as an education commissioner and asks the court to allow the districts to interpret the new law individually.

Here are a couple of excerpts from the 27-page document that argues the school districts’ point that minimum grading policies "rest upon a sound pedagogical foundation":

"They ensure that a student may still gain credit for a course as a whole and, in turn, continue progressing towards graduation, even after receiving a failing grade in, say, the first grading period, provided they can attain requisite grades in subsequent grading periods for the course. As such, minimum grading policies for report cards area key tool for keeping students in school.

"Indeed, under most grading policies, for a student to receive credit for a course, the student must attain an overall passing grade (i.e., at least a 70) that is based upon the average of the grades received for each grading period. If school districts award failing grades below a minimum threshold, borderline students who perform poorly in any grading period might be unable to raise their overall course average to passing, even if they receive passing grades in all other grading periods for the course."

However, the Texas Classroom Teachers Association, which represents 50,000 public school members across the state, thinks otherwise.

"It defies logic that a series of grades not subject to an arbitrary minimum could somehow magically average to a higher minimum grade as a composite," it states in a letter to Scott while urging him to issue an interpretation of the new law.

SB 2033 is the brainchild of Jane Nelson, R-Flower Mound, who said she was "disturbed" by the school districts’ defiance of the law.

Read More:

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Houston Chronicle.

Comments

Feldman?

It figures. They have to justify there big bills to the taxpayers of the district. Who ever heard of such a thing anyway as truth in grading (sarcasm very much intended). This is the same lawfirm that has filed repeated requests with the Texas AG to keep information out of the papers regarding the $30 million dollar global "taj mahal", basic police reports and other information the public pays for. This firm is racking in the legal fees on our tax dollar. Our board loves vendor feeding!

transparencyingovt

Sounds like an old lawyer joke...

Now why does FBISD need to get into another lawsuit that several districts are already involved with? Perhaps it is all about billing and who gets stuck with the tab.

Back in the day...

Back in the day, a grade of 24 was a 24. There were no do-overs; there were do-BETTERS on the test. Administration supported its faculty and staff when conflicts arose with the community (parents) instead of hanging them out to dry. Now, districts are forcing teachers, most of whom have more principles and integrity than administrators ever had, to simply give away grades in the arrogant, ridiculous vein of "it's the best way to ensure that a child still has a chance to pass the semester". Yet I've still got a question: How many students that receive 50's on a report card still end up passing? My guess is .000001%. And now our district, intent on wasting $30M-plus on a science center and already operating in the red, insists on wasting how much more on this moronic lawsuit.

Is there any wonder why so many students/parents have such tremendous senses of entitlement?

SB2033 and suit filed by Feldman for FBISD

When our district is operating with a budget deficit of millions of dollars, why in heaven's name would FBISD file suit to avoid honesty in grading when we have so many other things to spend our money on. We can't afford to open the new academies but we can afford to pay exorbitant legal fees to avoid simply giving students an honest grade instead of a trumped up 50! Dr. Jenny better wake up quick and stop drinking the koolaid. One of the reasons he was hired was for fiscal accountability. Obviously some things apparently never change ...

 

Post new comment

Post New Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img> <i> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.