Faced with a budget shortfall, Fort Bend school district officials are considering cutting back on the number of academies to open next year.
After reviewing the district’s plan to install new academies at four high schools and an advanced program at a middle school, the school board during a recent workshop expressed concerns that carrying out the plan with an $18 million deficit in the 2009-10 budget could deepen the district’s financial plight next year.
"Most districts are cutting programs rather than adding programs," said trustee David Reitz. "For budgetary reasons, we should probably delay the implementation of this by a year or two years."
Under the 2010-11 plan, Willowridge High School would see an “emerging technology” academy established while a math and science academy would be created at Dulles High and an "early college" academy housed at the district’s new high school being built in the Sienna Plantation area. Meanwhile, Hightower High’s engineering academy would be transferred to Elkins High.
The early college academy is designed for students not intent on completing a four-year college but to obtain an associate diploma and start a career early, said Jeannette Spain, director of academies.
In addition, as part of a plan to create a feeder system to ready students for the International Baccalaureate program started at Marshall High, work is ongoing at Missouri City Middle School to pave the way for launching an International Baccalaureate preparatory program, one year before an elementary-level International Baccalaureate preparatory program is slated to open at E.A. Jones Elementary.
The plans would expand the district existing academy system currently involving Bush, Clements, Willowridge, Hightower and Marshall high schools as well as Quail Valley Middle School.
Implementing all four academies would cost $500,000 - $125,000 per campus -- for a year. For the Missouri City Middle School’s International Baccalaureate preparatory program, $168,000 has been earmarked in the current-year budget.
Reitz, nevertheless, said he recognizes the value of academies, which are advanced-level programs with increased academic rigor.
“It gives students another reason to go to school and take their studies seriously. And it gives them an opportunity to explore another career interest early,” He said.
With student interest in academies on the rise, Superintendent Tim Jenney said the district should continue to grow academies but at a moderate pace.
"If we lose the forward momentum, we’ll lose the opportunities for our young people," he said.
Jenney proposed creating one to two new academies next year while delaying two or three for the future, an idea applauded by trustees.
Agreeing to the paced approach, trustee Susan Hohnbaum spelled out her concern about "a lot of money put in a very small area" considering the districtwide student population.
Trustee Marilyn Glover said she was “pleased with a compromise” Jenney proposed.
Much of the discussion was on what schools should get academies first, with consensus focused on Willowridge, opinions divided between Missouri City Middle School and Dulles High.
Reitz repeatedly urged consideration for the middle school’s international baccalaureate preparatory program, noting substantial work has been done at the campus, where two teachers have been hired at $100,000 for the program. Principal Trevor Lemon said teacher training is underway.
Officials will meet again to look more closely at costs for each program before making a final decision.



Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Houston Chronicle.
Comments
Academies vs. "Duplicate Museum"?
"After reviewing the district’s plan to install new academies at four high schools and an advanced program at a middle school, the school board during a recent workshop expressed concerns that carrying out the plan with an $18 million deficit in the 2009-10 budget could deepen the district’s financial plight next year."
I guess I'm uncertain as to why such critical campus level initiatives are placed on hold while they push forward with a vendor feeding project ($30 million dollars worth) like the "GSTC Project". One that many in the public question especially during these down times. Fund the academies and kill the vendor feeding duplicate. It's simple!
transparencyingovt
What is Reitz saying now?
"Most districts are cutting programs rather than adding programs," said trustee David Reitz. "For budgetary reasons, we should probably delay the implementation of this by a year or two years."
This is funny hearing this board member say this after voting for consecutive spending increases and tax increases too.
I believe Reitz has drawn 2
I believe Reitz has drawn 2 challengers for his re-election bid coming this spring. I think the public is tired of the deceptions by our board.
right on ANON
You couldn't be more right, anonymous! However, the use of common sense and basic fiscal responsibility is not a strong point of the board. In fact, it seems to be operating as an extension of the administration rather than an oversight committee as it is charged with doing. It's starting to look a lot like a certain board to the north that's on the verge of building a new $50M plus football stadium and rhymes with "Ate-EE".
System 1 Thinking
Well Mike, I think we see a pattern of districts using the same vendors and boards not questioning those suppliers or their attempts to influence policy, which is not the appropriate place for them to be involved, especially when they are billing for this supposed advice. I just wonder when boards will reassert themselves or are we locked into a closed cycle.
transparencyingovt
System 1
I think we're locked in a never-ending cycle. I'm sure you're familiar with the term "safety in numbers", right? That what I believe the mentality of school boards across the area and state have adopted: well, if THEY did it, this company must be great and above reproach. What's the worst that can happen? Of course, many board members leave the district before the full effect of their financial decisions have cost them significantly on a personal taxing level.
Closed systems
So true, I noticed Steve Smelly left right after his vote on increasing spending another 30 million dollars and then had the effrontery to claim, as the district budget sank deeper into record debt (nearly $20 million) to call himself in his campaign release for a commissioner seat a "goldwater" conservative. Now that is almost funny after leaving the district in the worst debt situation it has been in years and after voting for several annual property tax rate increases. We sure have 'em here in fbc.
transparencyingovt
Meet their shovels with pitchforks
I was certain that these FBISD board bozos had backed off from their Global Scam when FBISD ran out of money and realized that they could barely make payroll, but here they are again, buried deep inside the newspaper on Thanksgiving Day, the notice that they (Wallace and other vendors)plan to break ground in April. I swear if those bast@#$$ show up with shovels, the taxpayers need to show up with pitchforks!
PatriotMissive